Our Insights


Third Circuit Upholds Arbitration Agreement in Meal Break Class Action

Authors: Evan J. Shenkman (Morristown), Ryan T. Warden (Morristown)

Published Date: April 4, 2012

Quilloin v. Tenet Healthsystem Philadelphia, Inc., et al., 2012 WL 833742 (3d Cir. Mar. 14, 2012): In a precedential opinion, the Third Circuit held that an arbitration provision contained in an employment agreement signed by the plaintiff upon hiring was enforceable and compelled the plaintiff, who filed a class action under the Fair Labor Standards Act over automatic meal break deductions, to submit her claims to arbitration. The Third Circuit found that any ambiguity in the arbitration agreement regarding award of attorneys' fees and whether the arbitration agreement contained an implied class action waiver were questions for the arbitrator and did not render the arbitration agreement unconscionable. The Third Circuit also held that time limitations set forth in an arbitration agreement to follow several internal steps and procedures before submitting a claim to arbitration were not substantively unconscionable. Finally, the Third Circuit held that the arbitration clause in the employment contract was not rendered procedurally unconscionable based on the parties’ allegedly unequal bargaining positions.

Note: this article was published in the April 2012 issue of the New Jersey eAuthority.

Evan J. Shenkman  (Morristown)

Evan J. Shenkman
Evan J. Shenkman is a member of Ogletree Deakins’ Knowledge Management Department, serving as the firm’s Senior Manager of Knowledge Management Counsel and Research. In his role, Mr. Shenkman is responsible creating processes, practices, and software to allow firm attorneys to work smarter, faster, and more in sync; creating internal and client-facing collaborative tools; and managing the firm's team of Knowledge Management Counsel and the firm's Legal Researchers. He also manages...

Ryan T. Warden  (Morristown)

Ryan T. Warden
Ryan T. Warden defends employers against all types of employment-related claims, including allegations of discrimination, retaliation and harassment. Ryan is a member of the Firm’s Class Action Group and Wage and Hour Group and has extensive experience defending employers against class, collective and single plaintiff actions arising out of alleged violations of state and federal wage and hour laws. Ryan has defended clients in the retail, trucking and transportation and food service...