California’s Voting Leave Law: Employers’ Obligations as Election Day Approaches

As Election Day quickly approaches, California employers are reminded that the state voting leave law allows employees to take time off to vote in a statewide election.

Time Off to Vote

California employers are required to provide time off to their employees to vote. The state voting leave law, California Election Code section 14000, has three main components:

If an employee does not have sufficient time outside of his or her normal working hours to vote at a statewide election, then the employee may take time off of up to two hours of working time to vote without a loss of pay.
The time off for voting shall only be at the beginning or end of the regular working shift, whichever allows the most free time for the employee to vote and the least time off from the regular working shift, unless otherwise mutually agreed upon between the employer and employee.
The employee is required to provide notice to his or her employer of the need for time off to vote at least two working days in advance to arrange for voting time.

Employer Posting Requirements

California Election Code section 14001 requires California employers to post voting leave requirements in a conspicuous place for employees to view at least 10 days before every statewide election.

Employees Serving as Election Officials

Under California Election Code section 12312, employees may serve as election officials on Election Day without being disciplined because of his or her absence. Employers are not required to pay employees for the time they are absent from work to serve as election officials.

California employers should keep these rules in mind as they prepare to field employees’ requests for time off to vote.

Fifth Circuit Loss for Employee Who Refused Vaccine for Religious Reasons

As the COVID-19 vaccine becomes more readily available, employers are considering mandatory vaccination for their employees and in particular, how to respond to employee requests for accommodation, whether on the basis of disability or religion. In Horvath v. City of Leander, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently considered an employer’s proposed accommodations to a firefighter who refused a mandatory tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (TDAP) vaccine for religious reasons, and its analysis now provides timely guidance to employers considering a different type of mandatory vaccine.

Bills Seek to Expand Training Opportunities to Certain Laid Off Employees

Two pending bills (A1923 and S976) seek to provide employees who have (or should have) received notice under New Jersey’s WARN Act (the Millville Dallas Airmotive Plant Job Loss Notification Act ) with additional job training opportunities, such as being permitted to enroll without payment of tuition in a job training course regardless of any

DHS Proposes Shift to Wage-Based H-1B Selection Process

On November 2, 2020, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a proposed rule that, if implemented, would amend the process by which U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) selects H-1B registrations for H-1B cap-subject petitions. The proposed rule would replace the current H-1B random selection lottery process with a wage-based selection process, giving preference to applications for higher-paying positions.

Recommended Reading

Fifth Circuit Loss for Employee Who Refused Vaccine for Religious Reasons

Bills Seek to Expand Training Opportunities to Certain Laid Off Employees

DHS Proposes Shift to Wage-Based H-1B Selection Process