Reid v. Ingerman Smith LLP, No. 12-CV-0307(ILG-MDG) (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 27, 2012): In a sexual harassment lawsuit where the plaintiff sought emotional damages, the defendant filed a motion to compel discovery concerning the plaintiff’s social media accounts. The defendant argued that public postings on the plaintiff’s Facebook account contradicted her claim of mental anguish, and therefore any private postings and photographs might contain information relevant to the plaintiff’s state of mind. The plaintiff argued that she had an expectation of privacy with respect to her social media accounts and that the court should not require her to produce private information. While the court agreed that the plaintiff had some expectation of privacy, it explained that this expectation did not shield relevant communications from discovery. The court therefore ordered that the plaintiff disclose all communications and photographs that “reveal, refer, or relate to any emotion, feeling, or mental state . . . [and] that reveal, refer, or relate to events that could reasonably [be] expected to produce a significant emotion, feeling[,] or mental state.” However, the court held that the plaintiff need not disclose her private postings in full, and could withhold postings that have no bearing on her emotional state, such as posts of events concerning others. This decision reinforces the growing impact of social media on employment litigation and the importance for employers to incorporate social media communications into discovery requests.
Recommended Reading
Expect Significant EB-2 India Retrogression in December
The U.S. Department of State’s (DOS) Visa Bulletin sets out per country priority dates that regulate when an individual can begin the final phase of the “green card” process, either through adjustment of status or consular immigrant visa application. Individuals with a priority date that is earlier than the date listed for that visa category
New Jersey Bill Seeks to Protect Politically Active Employees from Retaliation
On January 28, 2013, a bill (S2488) was introduced that seeks to protect candidates for election to public office (federal, state, county, municipality, or school district) from retaliation by employers. Under the bill, it would be unlawful for employers to retaliate against their employees for campaigning or engaging in other related political activity during non-work hours.
Louisiana Governor Approves Bill Allowing Hair Samples to Be Used for Drug Testing
Governor Bobby Jindal recently approved Act 74, which clarifies that hair tests are an acceptable method for employers to drug test potential hires. Hair testing detects drug use by an individual up to 90 days prior to the day the test is given.