After a long hiatus, effective April 2011, the Social Security Administration (SSA) resumed its practice of sending out employer decentralized correspondence (DECOR) letters, otherwise known as “no-match” letters for tax year 2010. However, on October 27, 2011, SSA advised that, beginning August 29, 2011, owing to budgetary constraints, it had suspended sending these infamous no-match letters, the purpose of which is to advise employers that their workers are using a social security number that does not coincide with SSA’s records. SSA has not articulated if, or when, it will resume sending employer DECOR letters, or whether any will be sent commencing in April 2012. With regard to those DECOR letters already received by employers, SSA will not take any follow-up action and employers should follow the letters’ instructions. If an issue exists with regard to an employee’s name, the employer should double check its own records and, if that provides no resolution, the employee should attempt to correct the problem with SSA.
Recommended Reading
Hang Up After Hours? The Spring 2015 Regulatory Agenda Tackles This and Other Overtime Issues
On Thursday, May 21, 2015, the White House, through its executive branch and other federal agencies, issued the Spring 2015 edition of the Semiannual Regulatory Agenda. Published twice a year, the agencies’ regulatory agendas provide an outlook on regulatory activity, identify agency priorities, and offer additional details about the most significant actions the agencies intend to take in the coming year.
Virtual ‘Try On’ Features: Do They Create Biometric Privacy Concerns for Retailers?
Retailers’ virtual “try-on” features have come under attack lately by lawsuits claiming violations of consumers’ biometric privacy rights. The increasing risk of litigation highlights a new area of compliance concern for retailers as online shopping has become the new normal for many consumers.
Commission Rights Clarified Under New York Law
Pachter v. Bernard Hodes Group, Inc., __ N.Y.3d __, __ N.Y.S. 2d __ (2008) — On June 10, 2008, New York’s highest court addressed the important issue of when a sales commission is “earned,” and thus not subject to deductions for expenses by an employer under the state’s wage and hour laws. The Court held