The Looming December 1 Implementation Date for the Overtime Regs: Do Recent Challenges Mean a New Effective Date?
Author: Maria Greco Danaher (Pittsburgh)
Published Date: October 10, 2016
One question being asked by employers on a nearly daily basis is, “Do we really have to meet the December 1, 2016 effective deadline for the revisions to the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) overtime regulations?” The short answer is: Yes.
Attempts are being made to delay, change, soften, and eliminate the December 1 implementation date, but so far, without success. Here is a summary of some of the legal and legislative actions that have taken place since the May 18, 2016 publication of the new regulations:
In June, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and 43 other Senate Republicans filed a “motion of disapproval” under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), which allows lawmakers to vote to roll back controversial regulations. Under the CRA, Republicans would need only a simple majority in both chambers to block the overtime rule. But President Obama could veto their attempt to block it, and Republicans do not have enough support on their own to override a veto. To date, no further action has been taken on that motion.
On July 14, 2016, in an attempt to soften the impact of the new regulations, Congressman Kurt Schrader (D-OR) introduced a bill—the Overtime Reform and Enhancement Act (OREA)—to add to the regulations a phase-in provision, which would phase in the increase in the salary threshold in steps over the next three years and remove a current provision that increases the threshold salary automatically every three years. After its introduction in the House, the Bill was referred to the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. No further action has been taken.
On September 29, 2016, Senator Lamar Alexander, along with four other senators, introduced another bill, S. 3464, the Overtime Reform and Review Act. That bill is similar to the House bill that Congressman Schrader introduced in July to phase in the overtime rule incrementally. The Senate bill includes a five-year phase-in (as opposed to Congressman Schrader’s three-year period). In addition, the bill includes a provision requiring an independent study of the rule after the first year of implementation, which—should the rule be found to negatively impact U.S. workers and the economy—may then exempt nonprofit groups (including colleges and universities), state and local governments, and many Medicaid and Medicare-eligible facilities from any further increases under the rule.
Before recessing for the November elections, Congress signaled that the overtime rule will merit attention when Congress returns to work for its lame-duck session beginning in mid-November. In the meantime, business and industry groups, including the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) will continue to develop strategies for use when Congress returns to Washington, D.C. following the elections.
Because of the number of steps that must be taken prior to any change in the December 1 effective date, that date is unlikely to change. In addition, while not mandated by the new regulation, employers should consider implementing changes during the first day of the payroll week that includes December 1, because the regulation does require the changes to be fully in place by that date. (While an employer may decide to convert to the new rule in the middle of the payroll week, but it would be an administrative nightmare.) Be prepared.
Maria Greco Danaher regularly represents and counsels companies in employment related matters. She specializes in representing management in labor relations and employment litigation, and in training, counseling, and advising human resource departments and corporate management on these topics. Maria has first chaired trials in both federal and state courts since 1986, and regularly instructs attorneys and students in issues related to trial tactics. In addition to her litigation experience,...