Zack v. State of New Jersey, 2012 WL 832611 (App. Div. Mar. 14, 2012): In a welcome result for employers that earnestly work to reasonably accommodate disabled employees, the Appellate Division has affirmed the dismissal of a former employee’s NJLAD disability claim because the employer diligently investigated the employee’s requests and implemented numerous accommodations that responded to most, if not all, of the employee’s specific needs. The employee, who suffered from post-concussion syndrome accompanied by a hypersensitivity to light and certain odors, requested her workstation be relocated and retrofitted to provide an optimum environment to accommodate her sensitivity to light. The employer granted these requests and had other co-workers adjust their work environment and personal grooming habits to accommodate the plaintiff’s sensitivity to perfumes. Although not every request by the employee was accommodated – they refused to raise the height of the employee’s cubicle to eight or nine feet (to reduce brightness of the overhead lights) – the Appellate Division held that the employer’s good faith efforts and interactions with the plaintiff were sufficient to defeat her claim that she was denied a reasonable accommodation.
Recommended Reading
“Abusive Workplace” Bill Proposed
A Senate bill (S1823B), which the New York Senate Committee on Labor approved on March 15, would establish a private cause of action for an abusive work environment. This bill evolved after findings by the New York Legislature that 16 to 21 percent of employees directly experience health endangering workplace bullying, abuse and harassment, which has four times the prevalence of workplace sexual harassment. The purpose of the bill, which is presently awaiting a vote from the Senate, is to provide “legal redress for employees who have been harmed psychologically, physically or economically by being deliberately subjected to abusive work environments.”
Challenges to Standing and Venue in Class Action Litigation
Although a class action complaint may foreshadow years of litigation filled with thousands of plaintiffs and millions of dollars in potential damages and costs, there are several early motions that, if successful, may drastically reduce the scope of the case in terms of the size of the class and the number of claims at issue.
Justice Department Remarks on Potential Discrimination Claims Arising from the Non-Hire of Work-Authorized Foreign Nationals
In a recent Technical Assistance Letter, the U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Special Counsel for Immigration-Related Unfair Employment Practices (OSC) comments on whether (1) an employer may, without engaging in citizenship status or national origin discrimination, decline to hire an F-1 student visa holder with optional practical training (OPT) based solely on the fact that he or she has a limited period of employment authorization remaining;