On March 13, 2014, New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced agreements with four of the nation’s largest background check agencies whereby they will not, on behalf of their clients, issue automatic rejection letters to job applicants with criminal convictions. Under the agreements, HireRight, Inc., First Advantage, General Information Services Inc., and Sterling Infosystems agreed to defer hiring decisions to New York State employers to individually consider candidates pursuant to New York law. The agreements were purported to address the practice of employers utilizing these background check agencies to issue automatic rejection letters for applicants with prior felony convictions; however, New York Correction Law sections 752 and 753 generally require that applicants with criminal convictions be considered on a case-by-case basis using a multiple-factor test. For New York State employers, these agreements serve as a timely reminder to ensure compliance with New York law whenever an employment decision is based upon a prior felony conviction.
Recommended Reading
OFCCP Lowers VEVRAA Hiring Benchmark for Fifth Consecutive Year
On March 27, 2019, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) announced the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act of 1974 (VEVRAA) hiring benchmark for 2019.
Employee Arrests Outside of Work Hours: 4 Key Questions and Answers for Employers
When employees are arrested during their off-duty time and away from work, employers may need to make difficult choices balancing their various obligations. Among these are respecting the rights of arrested employees, ensuring the safety of workforces and workplaces, maintaining the continuity of business operations, and preserving brand integrity and corporate reputation—as well as considering how state and federal laws might relate to the conduct at issue and to any decision to retain, suspend, or discharge arrested employees. As with most things, process and risk assessment matter, and the way that decision-makers meet the moment may make the difference between an optimal outcome and an outcome that subjects employers to liability. Here are four questions and answers for employers weighing their options in these situations.
What to Do When ICE Comes Knocking
The Trump administration’s tough rhetoric and early aggressive actions on immigration promise a period of increased worksite enforcement. With the administration’s strong statements against illegal immigration and abuses of the immigration system, including an executive order calling for 10,000 new U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents, employers can expect an increased number of audits, raids, and investigations. Given this added scrutiny and the increased prospects of a fine or other penalty, employers may want to know their rights in the event of a worksite visit, and to review and update their protocols for responding to such visits.