Liu v. Siemens A.G., No. 13-CV-317(WHP) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 21, 2013) (Pauley, J.): Judge William H. Pauley III dismissed a retaliation claim under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank) brought by a former compliance officer, Meng-Lin Liu, who was employed by a Taiwanese subsidiary of Siemens A.G. Liu alleged that he was terminated for reporting suspected violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) based on an alleged kickback scheme on medical equipment sold in China and North Korea. However, the court concluded that, absent evidence that Congress intended Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provision to apply to acts committed outside U.S. borders, the court would not grant extraterritorial reach. Based on Supreme Court precedent, Judge Pauley held that, unless Congress clearly expressed its intent to provide extraterritorial effect to a U.S. statute, courts will presume “it is primarily concerned with domestic matters.” Such congressional intent was not indicated in Dodd-Frank, as some parts of the law specifically applied outside of the United States. Furthermore, the Dodd-Frank provision on which Liu relied to make his disclosure was not “required or protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.” Finally, Judge Pauley determined that “whistleblower” status is a distinct issue from whether Dodd-Frank’s anti-retaliation provision extended to overseas whistleblowers. The decision therefore provides needed clarity regarding the reach and scope of Dodd-Frank’s well-publicized whistleblower bounty provision.
Recommended Reading
Green Card Lottery Deadline is November 30
The registration period for the annual immigrant visa (“green card”) lottery will close on November 30. Approximately 50,000 immigrant visas are available pursuant to the “Diversity Lottery.” Persons born in countries that have sent a large number of immigrants to the United States within the past five years are ineligible. This includes persons born in
Proposed Bills Would Limit Employers’ Use of Credit Checks
A bill (A2561) introduced in the Assembly on March 16 would prohibit employers from requiring as a condition of employment that prospective or current employees consent to a credit check unless the employer: (1) is required by law to obtain that information; (2) reasonably believes the individual has engaged in unlawful activity; or (3) good credit history is a bona fide job qualification. Under the bill, employers also are prohibited from requiring as a condition of employment that individuals waive or limit any protection under the proposed law.
Ogletree Deakins International Video Series: At-Will Employment
In the final chapter of our four-part video series, Bonnie Puckett, of counsel in our International Practice Group, and Jean Kim, an associate in our International Practice Group, discuss the absence of at-will employment outside the U.S.