Employee handbooks typically contain an overview of company history, a set of employment policies and general guidance, and a clear and prominent disclaimer that nothing in the handbook creates a contract of employment between the company and its employees. The Raymours Furniture Company handbook went one step further—it also contained a mandatory arbitration agreement, which purported to require employees to arbitrate any and all employment related claims against the company. Raymours Furniture Company, Inc. v. Rossi, Civ. No. 13-4440 (D.N.J., Jan. 2, 2014). After an employee sent a demand letter to Raymours asserting various claims of discrimination, the company moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the handbook’s arbitration agreement. The court ruled against the company, finding that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable. It noted that the clear disclaimer on the handbook’s first page, which began: “THIS HANDBOOK IS NOT A CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT,” did not expressly exempt the arbitration policy. As such, the handbook did not clearly and unambiguously confirm the employee’s agreement to arbitrate. Moreover, Raymours’ reservation of its right to change the contents of the handbook at any time without notice rendered the arbitration provision illusory and unenforceable.
Recommended Reading
Supreme Court Requires Timely Challenge To Pay Decisions
In a sweeping decision, a 5-4 majority of the U.S. Supreme Court, split along ideological lines, ruled today that Title VII plaintiffs must timely challenge particular pay decisions and cannot rely on the continuing violation theory to reach back to allegedly discriminatory decisions made before the charge filing period established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
Navigating the Form I-9 for TPS and DED: Complex Verification Requirements
Over the past three months, the Biden administration has expanded immigration benefits for foreign nationals on humanitarian grounds. Temporary Protected Status (TPS) and Deferred Enforced Departure (DED) are two such humanitarian benefits that permit certain foreign nationals to live and work in the United States with government-issued employment authorization documents.
Supreme Court Strikes Down Affirmative Action in College Admissions
On June 29, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States held that certain race-conscious college admissions policies violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which prohibits discrimination based on race. The ruling comes in a decision consolidating two cases that challenged the use of race-conscious admissions policies by private and public universities aimed at maintaining racially diverse student bodies.