Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center, 946 N.Y.S.2d 27 (1st Dep’t May 29, 2012): The New York Appellate Division, First Department recently held that plaintiffs bringing discrimination claims under the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) must produce evidence of actual discrimination to survive summary judgment. It was less than one year ago when the First Department’s expansive interpretation of the NYCHRL in Bennett v. Health Management Systems, Inc., 936 N.Y.S.2d 112 (1st Dep’t 2011), suggested that NYCHRL discrimination or retaliation claims could overcome summary judgment even in the absence of evidence that the employer acted unlawfully simply by showing that a non-discriminatory justification proffered by the employer is “false, misleading, or incomplete.” In Melman, the First Department applied both the McDonnell Douglas standard and the mixed-motive test and concluded that the plaintiff had not met his burden on either because he had not presented “any evidence—either direct or circumstantial—from which it could rationally be inferred that age discrimination was a motivating factor, even in part, for Montefiore’s treatment of him.” The decision explained that even under the more lenient mixed-motive test, a plaintiff must still produce some evidence of actual discrimination.
Recommended Reading
Employee Access to Wage and Certain Employment Records for Limited Purposes
Under Act No. 822, and upon written request by an employee, the LWC may make available the employee’s wage and employer information, but for lending purposes, tenant screening and insurance underwriting only. This information shall be provided to the employee or his or her representative. At the request of the employee, the LWC may allow
6 FAQs on California’s Meal and Rest Break Rules
California’s meal and rest break rules are extremely technical and nuanced—and a failure to properly comply with them can result in penalties. Here are answers to six frequently asked questions (FAQs) regarding compliance with this intricate area of California labor and employment law.
Seriously Underfunded Multiemployer Defined Benefit Pension Plans—Relief Finally Arrives
We had pondered when this day would come. The doomsday scenario that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) would become insolvent in five to six years is now old history. (The new estimated time of PBGC insolvency is the mid-2040s.) Plan participants, the plans, employers, unions, and the PBGC had all been patiently waiting for relief—and they have apparently been rewarded with the relief they were seeking.