Melman v. Montefiore Medical Center, 946 N.Y.S.2d 27 (1st Dep’t May 29, 2012): The New York Appellate Division, First Department recently held that plaintiffs bringing discrimination claims under the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) must produce evidence of actual discrimination to survive summary judgment. It was less than one year ago when the First Department’s expansive interpretation of the NYCHRL in Bennett v. Health Management Systems, Inc., 936 N.Y.S.2d 112 (1st Dep’t 2011), suggested that NYCHRL discrimination or retaliation claims could overcome summary judgment even in the absence of evidence that the employer acted unlawfully simply by showing that a non-discriminatory justification proffered by the employer is “false, misleading, or incomplete.” In Melman, the First Department applied both the McDonnell Douglas standard and the mixed-motive test and concluded that the plaintiff had not met his burden on either because he had not presented “any evidence—either direct or circumstantial—from which it could rationally be inferred that age discrimination was a motivating factor, even in part, for Montefiore’s treatment of him.” The decision explained that even under the more lenient mixed-motive test, a plaintiff must still produce some evidence of actual discrimination.
Recommended Reading
2017 Cost-of-Living Adjustments on IRS Benefit and Contribution Limits
On October 27, 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) announced the cost-of-living adjustments impacting tax-qualified pension plans for 2017. The increase in the cost-of-living index met the statutory thresholds that triggered adjustments in some of the general pension limitations, including the limit on annual compensation. However, the individual limits on elective deferrals and catch-up contributions will not change for 2017.
Eighth Circuit Holds Independent Agreements for Attorneys’ Fees in FLSA Settlements Are Not Subject to Judicial Review
Last month, in Barbee v. Big River Steel, LLC, No. 18-2255 (June 20, 2019), the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that an independent agreement for attorneys’ fees in connection with a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) settlement does not require court approval—without intimating any position on the current circuit split as to whether FLSA settlements in general require judicial approval.
Bill to Repeal Family Leave Insurance Law
A bill (A2376) introduced in the Assembly on March 5 would repeal the Family Leave Insurance Law and would deposit money from the Family Temporary Disability Leave Account into the unemployment compensation insurance fund, which is currently insolvent. This bill comes on the heels of Governor Chris Christie’s announcement of a multi-step plan to rescue