Quick Hits
- In State of Texas v. Bondi, the Fifth Circuit overturned a district court’s injunction that had prevented enforcement of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) against the State of Texas as an employer.
- The court found that the U.S. House of Representatives’ use of proxy voting during the COVID-19 pandemic did not violate the U.S. Constitution’s Quorum Clause.
- The PWFA broadly requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations for employees with limitations arising from pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions—but regulatory changes may be on the horizon.
Background
The PFWA, which went into effect on June 27, 2023, requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation to workers with known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, absent undue hardship. This is true regardless of whether the “known limitations” constitute a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Thereafter, the EEOC began enforcement of the PWFA and issued its final regulations, explaining in an associated press release that it “provides clarity to employers and workers about who is covered, the types of limitations and medical conditions covered, how individuals can request reasonable accommodations, and numerous concrete examples.”
The PWFA faced immediate legal challenge, including by the State of Texas. The State of Texas’s argument focused on the U.S. Constitution’s Quorum Clause, which requires a majority of members of the House or U.S. Senate to be present in order to constitute the necessary quorum (or majority percentage) to pass legislation. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the House implemented a rule that allowed its nonpresent members to vote by proxy. And it was pursuant to this rule that the PWFA was passed.
The District Court’s Injunction
The district court agreed with the State of Texas that the U.S. Congress violated the Constitution when it included physically absent members in the quorum count for passage of the PWFA. Because Texas requested an injunction only on its own behalf, the court prohibited enforcement of the law by the EEOC only as to the State of Texas, leaving it in effect as to all other covered employers.
The Fifth Circuit’s Opinion
On appeal, the Fifth Circuit held that in-person voting was not required under the Quorum Clause. The Fifth Circuit found that the plain language of the Quorum Clause does not explicitly require physical presence for voting. The court highlighted that historical practices dating back to 1789 support the notion that a quorum can be presumed even if a majority of members are not physically present. The court also emphasized that the Constitution was designed to adapt to changing circumstances over time.
Thus, the Fifth Circuit held, “The House’s proxy-voting rule did not violate anyone’s fundamental rights. There is a reasonable relationship between the rule and the result it seeks—majoritarian rule. And the constitutional text, history, and tradition indicate that the Quorum Clause contains no physical-presence requirement that the House’s rule could have flouted.” With this, the court vacated the district court’s injunction, allowing the PWFA to be enforced against the State of Texas.
Implications for Employers
This case affirms the constitutionality of the PWFA, which has been in effect for private employers for more than two years. With limited exception on the issue of abortion, the EEOC’s final regulations remain in force nationwide, now including Texas’s public employers. Notably, however, the EEOC under the Trump administration has indicated that it intends to rescind these Biden-era regulations, which may ease the accommodation requirements currently imposed on employers.
Ogletree Deakins’ Employment Law Practice Group and Leaves of Absence/Reasonable Accommodation Practice Group will continue to monitor developments and will provide updates on the Employment Law and Leaves of Absence blogs as additional information becomes available.
Follow and Subscribe
LinkedIn | Instagram | Webinars | Podcasts